...there we stood in the doorway We heard the mission bell and we were thinking to ourselves "This could be heaven or this could be hell" Mirrors on the ceiling The pink champagne on ice. And she said: "We are all just prisoners here of our own device." (Eagles)

Monday, May 26, 2008

1 more comment on Money vs. Education

There are so many aspects about SpEd that don't meet the trained eye. One aspect about the previous story of the kid getting "voted out of the class" is that the article states the kid was being evaluated for autism ---- since February.



For those who are buying into the reality that our public school system is more about the "'business' of education" rather than the "business of 'education', I will follow my previous post's comments by examining the following concept. Delay, delay, delay also saves money.

For those who must deal with the seedy side of special education, it may be easier to realize how the student's are more about "business decisions" than "education decisions", yet this same decision making strategy is used with regular education kids.

The following analogy contained in the linked article may make it more clear. One must understand that under IDEA, parent's have a "right" to request an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE). My understanding of the rules, despite what I have heard in IEP meetings, is that the parent does not have to provide a reason for the request (read the procedural safeguards), the parents only have to state that they disagree with the District's evaluation and they (parents) are requesting an IEE at public expense.

Upon this request, my understanding of the rules is that the District has two options - provide the IEE or go to Due Process. No threats that if the IEE says the same thing, the parents have to pay. No promises of delays until next year at which time the IEP team can look at the situation again, and none of the parsing and bullshit that usually comes when a parent tries to exercise their "rights".

I have several anecdotal stories of the abuse towards IEE evaluators. One story is about how an independent evaluator re-wrote a complete evaluation, after the first one was presented in an IEP meeting. There is a lot of power behind some district's ignorance and arrogance.


The Blame Game!
Are School Problems the Kids' Fault?
by
Pamela Darr Wright, M.A., M.S.W.
Licensed Clinical Social Worker




Independent Educational Evaluations

Parents ask: "Why can’t I tell the school that I want an independent educational evaluation done on my child? Money is short. Private testing is expensive. Aren’t we are entitled to this?"

Before we answer your question, let’s change the facts.

If you belong to a managed care health plan, you have a primary care doctor. This person entered into a contractual agreement with your insurance company, and agreed to abide by certain rules. The most important rule is that this doctor agreed to hold medical costs down by managing care.How does this work?

In managed care,your primary care doctor acts as a "gatekeeper," regulating (limiting) your access to medical treatment. If you go to a specialist without an appropriate referral by your primary care doctor, your insurance company does not have to pay for your treatment. If your doctor is successful in holding costs down, the insurance company will reward him or her with financial bonuses. If your doctor isn't willing to play by these rules, the insurance company will probably cancel his contract. He will lose you and many other patients – and his livelihood.

Now, let’s assume that you have a sick child. You take your child to your primary care doctor who is associated with the managed care company. Although the doctor makes a diagnosis and prescribes treatment, your child gets sicker. You ask for a referral to a specialist. After discussion and disagreement, the doctor refers your child to a specialist – who is also a member of the managed care plan.

This specialist signed a contract with the managed care entity in which he is forbidden to fully inform you about the treatment options for your child - this is called a "gag order." If you learn about these treatments, you will want them for your child. The best solution from the insurance companies perspective is to keep you ignorant about these treatment options. because your HMO or managed care group does not want to pay for them.

Do you want your sick child treated by doctors who are not permitted to inform you about certain (expensive) treatment options? Of course not! Your child’s health is at stake.

Now, let’s return to your question about independent evaluations. Earlier in this article, you learned that most school psychologists officially consider only child or family factors when they assess children’s learning and behavior problems. Aren’t things different with independent evaluators?

The relationship between independent evaluators and school districts is often similar to the relationship between managed care specialists and insurance companies. In many jurisdictions, people who are on the approved list of independent evaluators have agreed to abide by certain rules. When they perform evaluations on children, they are paid by the school district.

As a parent, you have to ask yourself this question: If my evaluator is paid by the school district, how independent can he or she be?

In our practice, we see cases in which an independent educational evaluator recommends that a child receive more or different special education serves than the district wants to provide. After making pro-child recommendations, these diagnosticians were dropped from the school district’s approved list of evaluators.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

story of the kid getting "voted out of the class"

Best comment I read was from "Timmy!"
(below)
We "vote" smokers "out" and everyone applauds.

Why is this tyranny any different?

It is still voting based on behavior "we" deem unacceptable.
**********************

Made me think.

PRO On HCPS said...

I don't have time to compose my response to anon 7:51, but I will later.

In the meantime, I will contemplate the concept of a smoker being placed in a situation where cigarettes are taken away from him (problem solved while in this controlled environment) vs. the concept of putting an autistic person where the autism is "taken away" from them in a controlled situation (suggestions accepted as to where that would be).

The use of the word "tyranny" in the context of an educational setting makes me think also. I speak often of arrogance, ignorance and the abuse of power of public school systems. Maybe there is a connection there somewhere.

Later.

Anonymous said...

I understood the post to mean that the "behavior" was the issue.

"Behavior" within the context of a group of people. It sounded to me as though the student's "behavior" was impeding the progress of the rest of the class.

Now if the class itself decided to "vote out" the student it must have been pretty severe behavior.

If the student was misplaced then perhaps we should vote out those responsible.

Aside from hurt feelings and poor placement, I don't get the outcry.

I moved away from a neighborhood because it was too close to a group home and I couldn't deal with what I saw. Am I bad? I don't care - it was MY quality of life - I voted myself out.

PRO On HCPS said...

I was composing my response to my 7:09 post when I heard the little blip signaling someone had posted something, and it was anon 3:27.

I will take another course to try to get to my desired outcome. There is so much to these issues. I will take it one sentence at a time, and see if I make sense.


1- "I understood the post to mean that the "behavior" was the issue."----- too broad for me to respond to.

2- ""Behavior" within the context of a group of people. It sounded to me as though the student's "behavior" was impeding the progress of the rest of the class."------ I agree with this statement completely.

3.0- "Now if the class itself decided to "vote out" the student...." ----- We are talking five year olds. If they, on their own, came up with a democratic process to "vote out" one of their peer's, they are indeed socially gifted as individuals and a group. Did they extend this voting privilege to the targeted kid? I didn't see that he got to vote.

3.5 "......it must have been pretty severe behavior." ------ Granted. I don't dispute this conclusion.


4 "If the student was misplaced then perhaps we should vote out those responsible." ---- I can go either way with this one. Some professional educators recognize the limits of their expertise and ask for assistance in areas they need help with. Some "professional educators" hide their ignorance with arrogance and abuse of their authority and claim they are "experts" and no one is going to tell them what to do or how to do it. Some education systems recognize the limits of their expertise and ask for assistance in areas they need help with. Some "education systems" hide their ignorance with arrogance and abuse of their authority and claim they are "experts" and no one is going to tell them what to do or how to do it.

5 - "Aside from hurt feelings and poor placement, I don't get the outcry." - - - My best attempt to answer this is to start with the definition of "continuum" - ( A continuous extent, succession, or whole, no part of which can be distinguished from neighboring parts except by arbitrary division."). The teacher had a continuum of strategies to deal with the situation she was facing.

She chose a strategy that she thought would effect the kid's behavior. The strategy was what I would consider a negatively based behavioral strategy as opposed to a positively based behavioral strategy. She chose a strategy that requires a level of pragmatic thinking - "1. of or pertaining to a practical point of view or practical considerations.". If the student had not responded to months of what we can (should) assume were "normal behavioral interventions" and they were not working, why think that ostracizing (1. to exclude, by general consent, from society, friendship, conversation, privileges) would have the desired effect on the kid's cognitive ability?

It is more than "hurt feelings". It is about a cognitive dysfunction. It's like yelling at a deaf kid who is doing something wrong. As wrong as the kid may be, who is the ignorant one to keep yelling at him?

The outcry is from people who understand disabilities as a reason, not an excuse.

6 -" I moved away from a neighborhood because it was too close to a group home and I couldn't deal with what I saw. Am I bad? I don't care - it was MY quality of life - I voted myself out."----- You mean you exercised your ability of "home choice"? You mean you didn't like where you were, so you moved from a negative situation? Sounds great to me. I am not sure what you mean about what you "saw". I will assume that you had no professional responsiblity to those in the group home, as opposed to a school system that has a professional responsibility to those students within it's care.

Anonymous said...

Well put Ed! Even I understood and learned something.

Thanks for taking the time to lay it out for us "outsiders".