...there we stood in the doorway We heard the mission bell and we were thinking to ourselves "This could be heaven or this could be hell" Mirrors on the ceiling The pink champagne on ice. And she said: "We are all just prisoners here of our own device." (Eagles)

Wednesday, August 1, 2007

"A Foot in the Door"

As a result from discussions on another blog, I posted this missive on his website -Eskay Expresso:

A few premises first. My oldest son has forever told me there is no such thing as coincidence. Because of circumstances in my life, I was exposed to many experiences which led me to seek nation wide training learning about the laws of IDEA. Having recently discovered this modern day activity of blogging, it led me to my recent self appointment as the Motel Special Ed Concierge. I honestly can not remember how I came upon Eskay Expresso, but it happened. We became involved in a discussion about education and business - well - just read the transcripts.

This is a coincident. Yesterday, I was exposed to the Business Round Table and it’s relationship to education.. Last night, I heard a radio talk show host discuss the history of the attempts towards socialized medicine in the United States.

I couldn't write down the names of the people (Reagan was one who spoke against it) and the congressional statements he was citing, but I assume the facts can be traced. He (host) said that the first attempt to establish socialized medicine for all failed. So, in order to “get their foot in the door”, the proponents chose to target the elderly and the disabled, because there would be public sympathy, hence Medicare and Medicade. Once they have their foot in the door, they were closer to their goal.

When he said “disabled”, my mind shifted gears. My colleagues and I have many a time discussed why is there a set of Federal Regulations (IDEA) that is so poorly supported, does not have one state that is even close to compliance and was basically ignored for many years by parents, schools and courts until modern technology changed the playing field. We have posed the question - “why not get rid of it, it is so destructive to enforce.” We have far too often seen the destruction and waist of resources on both “sides” follow the same course, while the student (the marble about which the fight is over) remains static.

Then it hit me. Perhaps the whole concept of IDEA was to “get their foot in the door.” I will continue to pursue this concept. While there are many participants in the world of Special Ed, for the one’s, on both “sides”, that have to go through hell because of a “foot in the door”, it is a cruel hoax.

"We need to deny that there's anything "special" about being disabled, so we can stop getting "special treatment" instead of justice -John R. Woodward, M.S.W. http://www.jik.com/ilclang.html#TIME_TO_GET_RID_OF_SPECIAL

2 comments:

PRO On HCPS said...

REPRESENTATIVE MIKE CASTLE:.....Why do I like No Child Left Behind? I like it because it disaggregates the information. I believe that if you are running a school system, if you are trying to educate the children – frankly, you have to educate the children with disabilities, you have to educate the children who are in minority groupings or low income. These may historically have been more difficult populations, but every bit as important as anybody else. And as a result of that, I think we see that happening. We had a very sharp critic in my Gannett as a matter of fact – newspaper at home – on education, and she was writing critically about No Child Left Behind on a pretty regular basis. But every single story had in it, an example of a school where they were making adjustments so they could help solve the problems they had because they had not made adequate yearly progress.


MR. HENRY JOHNSON:Just think a moment about the importance of this enterprise called education. Over 200 years ago, Thomas Jefferson said, “The purpose of school is to train citizens to participate in the democracy.” I think that’s the best stated purpose of this business – schooling – that I’ve ever seen, and I think that applies. Think further about the one public entity that is charged with assigning from generation to generation the knowledge, the values, the mores, the institutions that this society holds dear; and there’s only one public institution that’s so charged, and that’s public schools. So to expect less of students because of their economic circumstances or because of their gender or race or ethnicity is improper; and No Child Left Behind says, “That’s not acceptable.” So, the grade that I would give No Child for its concept is an A – the highest possible score.

The implementation of it is less than perfect, but that’s alright. .......
MR. WHITMIRE: And what’s working least well?

MR. JOHNSON: Well, I think the special ed issue needs to be resolved. You’ve got a requirement under IDEA that says a student must be educated in the most appropriate, least restrictive educational environment. You’ve got a requirement under No Child that says if – now, these are not exact words but the essence of it is if that most appropriate, least restrictive alternative is off grade level and you assess at that off grade level, by definition, that child contributes to not meeting adequate yearly progress, and local school officials find that troublesome. It sort of doesn’t pass the face validity test. ......

BRT Forum http://www.businessroundtable.org//newsroom/document.aspx?qs=58E6BF807822B0F1AD7408722FB51711FCF53CE

PRO On HCPS said...

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/speech/edlabor_dem/RelJul30NCLBSpeech.html

Chairman Miller Remarks on the Future of the No Child Left Behind Education Law

Monday, July 30, 2007


WASHINGTON, DC -- Below are the prepared remarks of U.S. Rep. George Miller (D-CA), chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, for a speech at the National Press Club on the future of the No Child Left Behind law.

.....A recent Center on Education Policy study of all 50 states found gains in students’ reading and math proficiency and the narrowing of the achievement gap among groups of students since the implementation of No Child Left Behind.

There are more qualified teachers in the classroom today, because we made it a priority. .....



.......My vision for this next bill is to take America’s education policy in a new direction by doing six key things:

Provide much-needed fairness and flexibility.
Encourage a rich and challenging learning environment and promote best practices and innovation taking place in schools throughout the country.
Support teachers and principals.
Continue to hold schools accountable for students’ progress.
Join the effort to improve America’s high schools.
Invest in our schools......

Dazzle or baffle?